COMED BE BACKUP POWER CAPABILITIES PILOT · WALKER-MILLER ENERGY SERVICES × ICF

Power flows both ways.

An electric vehicle is also a battery on wheels. ComEd commissioned a study of what bi-directional (V2X) charging is worth — for emissions, for grid reliability, and for the communities that usually get this technology last. I led the design, pitch, and execution of the research, with the support of my leadership and our partners at ICF and ComEd.

ROLEResearch Lead — study design, pitch, and execution
CLIENT & PARTNERSComEd · Walker-Miller Energy Services, with ICF
METHODSProspective LCA (ISO 14040/14044), Monte Carlo sensitivity, GIS-based MCDA with AHP + TOPSIS
STATUSApril–December 2025 · completed · final deliverables with ComEd

The question

When an EV can push power back out — to the grid (V2G), a home (V2H), or a building (V2B) — it becomes backup power and a grid-flexibility resource. ComEd wanted to know whether that's actually good for the environment compared with the alternatives, and how to deploy it so that low-income and environmental-justice communities benefit instead of being passed over.

I pitched a study that answers both questions in one framework: a prospective life cycle assessment for the environmental side, and a spatial equity analysis for the social side.

The hard part is the word "prospective." V2X is around technology readiness level 5 today; the study has to estimate impacts out to 2040, on a grid whose fuel mix is changing every year. That meant modeling hourly grid emissions under three futures — base, optimistic, and pessimistic — and being honest about uncertainty with Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis.

The Study at a Glance Per the statement of work and midpoint memo
5SYSTEMS MODELED — V2G · V2H · V2B · BESS · MANAGED CHARGING
3GRID FUTURES — BASE · OPTIMISTIC · PESSIMISTIC
15yrHORIZON — 2025 TO 2040, HOURLY EMISSION FACTORS
ISO14040 / 14044 COMPLIANT pLCA
1kWhFUNCTIONAL UNIT — NET ENERGY DISCHARGED (PER SYSTEM)

DATA: NREL CAMBIUM 2024 HOURLY SCENARIOS · EPA eGRID 2023 · ARGONNE GREET · EPA EJSCREEN · DOE LEAD · ILLINOIS EIEC · COMED EQUITY REPORTS

Designing the study

The pitch had to convince a utility that a designer-led research team could deliver an engineering-grade assessment. The design choices did that work. We defined a functional unit per system (one kilowatt-hour of net energy discharged), drew the boundary at the use phase — charging, discharging, inverter losses, battery degradation, round-trip efficiency — and committed to documenting every assumption in a pedigree matrix so reviewers could judge data quality for themselves.

Each scenario got real numbers: discharge cycles per year, energy per discharge, round-trip efficiency, end-of-life battery capacity, and how much degradation is fairly attributed to V2X use rather than ordinary driving.

The pLCA — Four Phases, April to October ISO 14040 / 14044 · per the SOW
01 — GOAL & SCOPE

Define what counts

Functional units, system boundaries, and impact categories (climate, air quality, resource efficiency, human health), finalized with ComEd.

02 — INVENTORY

Build the dataset

Pilot and field data where available; GREET, eGRID, and Cambium projections adjusted for a changing grid; every assumption logged in a pedigree matrix.

03 — IMPACT

Quantify the effects

IPCC AR6 factors for greenhouse gases; EPA TRACI 2.2 for air quality and human health. Outputs expressed per functional unit so systems compare directly.

04 — INTERPRET

Find what matters

Monte Carlo runs across scenarios, hotspot identification, and integration with the equity analysis to produce recommendations ComEd can act on.

What the data shows

All five flexible-energy systems reduce emissions, and the rankings are consistent: V2G avoids the most carbon per kilowatt-hour today. The twist is the trend. As the grid gets cleaner, the bi-directional systems' climate benefit shrinks — while managed charging's benefit grows roughly five-fold by 2040, because its value comes from shifting load into increasingly clean off-peak hours.

The data also surfaced a caution: in the optimistic 2030 scenario, peak emissions briefly fall below off-peak in some hours. A time-of-use program calibrated for today's grid could shift load into dirtier hours. Explore the numbers:

Emissions Avoided per kWh — Midpoint Results kg CO₂e per functional unit · midpoint memo values
Why the Benefit Changes — Marginal Grid Intensity, 2025→2040 kg CO₂e/kWh · NREL Cambium · 2030 base interpolated
0.80.40.0 2025203020352040
PEAK HOURS — WHAT DISCHARGING DISPLACES OFF-PEAK — WHAT CHARGING CONSUMES

The equity half

Environmental benefit means little if the technology lands only in wealthy zip codes. The second half of the study was a GIS-based multi-criteria decision analysis of ComEd's service territory: socio-economic criteria weighted with an analytical hierarchy process, mapped, and ranked with TOPSIS to find the best sites for equitable V2X deployment — with specific attention to Illinois' environmental-justice, R3, and low-income designations.

The atlas below is a working recreation of that analysis built from the project's actual data layers: ComEd-territory zip codes, census tracts bridged through the HUD crosswalk, DOE LEAD energy burden, the 21 peaker plants in ComEd territory with their emissions and EJ demographics, and EV registrations per zip from the Illinois Secretary of State (2019–2025), projected forward with a logistic growth model. The working hypothesis: keeping peaker plants turned off delivers its biggest social impact in EIEC communities — the places where high energy burden, peaker pollution, and a growing dispatchable EV fleet overlap.

Peaker Displacement Atlas — ComEd Territory, 2025→2040 Built from the project's data layers · analytical recreation
2030
● ZIP — SIZE = PROJECTED EVs · BRIGHTNESS = SOCIAL-IMPACT SCORE ◯ TOP-QUARTILE ENERGY BURDEN (EIEC FOCUS) ▲ PEAKER PLANT — SIZE = CO₂e
PROJECTED EVs IN TERRITORY
DISPATCHABLE MWh PER PEAK EVENT*

HIGHEST SOCIAL-IMPACT ZIP CODES

    SOURCES: ILSOS EV REGISTRATIONS BY ZIP (2019–2025) · HUD ZIP–TRACT CROSSWALK · DOE LEAD ENERGY BURDEN · COMED-TERRITORY PEAKER DATASET (21 PLANTS) · AFDC STATIONS FOR ZIP CENTROIDS. *ASSUMES 10 kWh DISPATCHED PER PARTICIPATING EV; PARTICIPATION 10% / 20% / 5% BY SCENARIO. ZIPS WITHOUT STATION-DERIVED CENTROIDS ARE PLACED NEAR THEIR COUNTY CENTER.

    The outcome

    60SCENARIO-YEAR DATAPOINTS IN THE pLCA RESULTS
    ~0.20KG CO₂e AVOIDED PER kWh — V2G, 2025 BASE CASE
    GROWTH IN MANAGED CHARGING'S BENEFIT BY 2040

    The study completed in December 2025. The full pLCA, the spatial equity MCDA, scenario integration, and final recommendations were delivered to ComEd, along with the ArcGIS data layers, Power BI dashboards, survey instruments, and outreach materials specified in the statement of work. (The final deliverables are ComEd's, so the quantitative results shown on this page come from the midpoint technical memo.) The strategic findings held: bi-directional charging's climate case is strongest in the next decade, its resilience case is durable, and time-of-use programs will need recalibration as the grid changes.

    Years of embedding with engineers is what made this one possible: I scoped the methodology, made the pitch, and ran the study, backed by my leadership and our partners at ICF and ComEd.

    NEXT CASE STUDY — 02 / 07 CLAWS — ATLAS & VEGA →

    CONTENT BASED ON THE PROJECT STATEMENT OF WORK AND MIDPOINT TECHNICAL MEMO; THE STUDY COMPLETED IN DECEMBER 2025 AND FINAL DELIVERABLES ARE OWNED BY COMED. THE ATLAS IS AN ANALYTICAL RECREATION FROM THE PROJECT'S SOURCE DATA LAYERS, NOT THE DELIVERED MCDA. 2030 BASE-CASE GRID VALUES INTERPOLATED.